Average Joe
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2019
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 63
- Points
- 28
Irrelevant. LOL This is posted on KIA’s corporate website. Nothing to see here I guess. In what world is a QC lawsuit posted on a manufacturer’s website against multiple model/years irrelevant in the context of a meaningful quality control/reliability history discussion? Do you try to suppress all the other threads that aren’t simply glowing reviews of KIA and the Telluride? Maybe you do, but I don’t stalk your posts to know. I thought this was a forum for open discussion about all things Telluride, not simply a sunshine pumper fan club. If you have shares or vested interest in KIA, I could understand attempts to censor discussions, I guess. Trust me, if I didn’t like the Telluride, I wouldn’t waste time here. If you don’t see value in my threads or comments, please feel free not to respond, but quit trying to build some false narratives about people that start topics that aren’t always glowing or that you aren’t always interested in. Otherwise, it just comes off as being a close-minded fanboy.Well, you're certainly not a part of it since you don't own any of the references vehicles or a Telluride. Now you're just trolling... you always ask for thoughts on irrelevant topics or comparisons.
I didn't see a mention of a settlement on that webpage. There is only a very small link at the bottom left, that could be a legal requirement, going to the kiaenginesettlement.com URL that your originally posted.Appreciate your thoughts. This is not Kia's corporate website (bottom left)?:
Kia Owners Portal
owners.kia.com