• THIS SECTION IS ONLY FOR DISCUSSIONS RELATING TO BUYING A TELLURIDE. PLEASE USE A DIFFERENT SECTION FOR POSTING MESSAGES ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN BUYING A TELLURIDE. THANK YOU!

  • Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my SUV" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your leather interior, please post in the Interior section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.
  • Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop

Ridiculous $5k upcharge for Nightfall.

Percent deviation from what? MSRP? If you're paying 12% below MSRP on the Volvo and MSRP on the Kia, how will that compute 5-10 years down the road?

I think the big wildcard for all manufactures is going to be electric adaption.
I agree. It is just a data point to me that means if you buy a Volvo you can't afford to buy above MSRP unless you don't care about taking a huge hit. But if you buy the Telluride a little above MSRP, it's just a sunk cost but not potentially as bad as a Volvo that drops off after 2 years a lot more.
 
MSRP as we know stands for manufactured suggested retail price... the seller in this case the dealer can upcharge or sell under msrp up to them and up to us the consumer to pay or not to pay... yes its sounds dirty but it what it is... we can't hate on them trying to capitalize on trying to take advantage of all the rage the Tellurides have... example i bought a 20 ex for 41k put 22000 miles sold it on Saturday for 37k to a dealer not bad i'd say
Good for them if they can find customers as willing/naive as that.
 
Percent deviation from what? MSRP? If you're paying 12% below MSRP on the Volvo and MSRP on the Kia, how will that compute 5-10 years down the road?

I think the big wildcard for all manufactures is going to be electric adaption.
Depreciation is predicted but most models use average sales price as cars don't usually sell at MSRP. GM and ford discount certain vehicles $10-$15k this time of year so that will figure into the average retail price. If not, first year depreciation would be +30%. So, if you pay over average retail price you are already behind.
______________________________
 
There is not a hair on my head that would pay over MSRP, out of principal.
I pride myself on not paying full price on any asset that is "negotiable". let alone a mark-up.
Ordered EX AWD at below MSRP.
Granted I will have to wait another 3-4 months but in life I learned that delaying gratification pays off.
where and how did you order, nowcar?
 
Yep - that is a very accurate observation. It's actually a Chinese brand now - and while Kia, as a brand is on the upward trajectory - Volvo is on the opposite trail (too many reliability issues in the 2016/2017 models).
I think at MSRP, Telluride is an amazing value for money and that's why I have made up my mind to go with it - but, against my principal here to pay any markup - especially considering this is going to be a long-termer for us (predicting a 7-8 year ownership right now).
Being a Chinese brand is not necessarily a bad thing. All cars on the road today contain manly Chinese electronics in them regardless of the brand. Sure, 10-15 years ago the idea of a Chinese car would be laughable. However, 50 years ago the idea of a Japanese car was also laughable and Korean was laughable 15 years ago. What you are typing on right now was made in China regardless if it is a computer or smart device and it works just fine (I assume).

When Geely bought Volvo 10 years ago it was to get their know how and technology to improve their oven products but also in invest capital into the Volvo brand to take it to the next level. Ford ownership did not do them any favors. I work for a Chinese company who bought IBM's computer business and they have continued to innovate the Thinkpad brand and create new and better products. They have been the world's top PC manufacturer for a few years now--both in sales and quality. They also bought Motorola from Google who only wanted to strip it for the phone tech and didn't care about the company or brand. Motorola is almost finished with their turnaround and was finally profitable last year.
 
Being a Chinese brand is not necessarily a bad thing. All cars on the road today contain manly Chinese electronics in them regardless of the brand. Sure, 10-15 years ago the idea of a Chinese car would be laughable. However, 50 years ago the idea of a Japanese car was also laughable and Korean was laughable 15 years ago. What you are typing on right now was made in China regardless if it is a computer or smart device and it works just fine (I assume).

When Geely bought Volvo 10 years ago it was to get their know how and technology to improve their oven products but also in invest capital into the Volvo brand to take it to the next level. Ford ownership did not do them any favors. I work for a Chinese company who bought IBM's computer business and they have continued to innovate the Thinkpad brand and create new and better products. They have been the world's top PC manufacturer for a few years now--both in sales and quality. They also bought Motorola from Google who only wanted to strip it for the phone tech and didn't care about the company or brand. Motorola is almost finished with their turnaround and was finally profitable last year.
Nothing against Chinese brands - It's just that Japanese, Korean, German and American brands have a long history and are each known to have certain strengths (Reliability, Value, Engineering and Power being the strengths respectively). Volvo was known for safety - but with almost every manufacturer now putting all safety features as standard, they have lost their advantage. After Geely acquisition, while the SPA architecture has been a runaway hit - their reliability has taken major suffering. I never expected to see Volvo at the very bottom of consumer reliability ratings (2017 and 2018).
 
Nothing against Chinese brands - It's just that Japanese, Korean, German and American brands have a long history and are each known to have certain strengths (Reliability, Value, Engineering and Power being the strengths respectively). Volvo was known for safety - but with almost every manufacturer now putting all safety features as standard, they have lost their advantage. After Geely acquisition, while the SPA architecture has been a runaway hit - their reliability has taken major suffering. I never expected to see Volvo at the very bottom of consumer reliability ratings (2017 and 2018).

Yeah, their reliability has been dismal. Lets hope that it will come around. Volvo has been a bit lost for a while as they were big on safety but now everyone is (for the most part). Then, they tried to make sexy cars but it fell a bit flat and were not as good the the German competition. Now it seems that they are trying to go upmarket and focus again on safety. We will see how that pans out but at least they have money behind them so they can afford to make mistakes.
______________________________
 
As I am currently evaluating Volvo XC90 - let me list out some of the other pros, and some cons as well - compared to an Telluride SX with Prestige ($48k MSRP).
  • Volvo is currently discounted to about 10-12% off MSRP without any negotiations. My friend just bought an XC90 T6 Momentum 7 seater this weekend (7 seater has bench middle row) with an MSRP of $64.5k at $54k. That is a total of 16% discount on MSRP. His 5-year total cost of ownership is now already discounted by 10%, taking depreciation into account.
  • Volvo's interior is plusher. The seats are amazing, and the overall cabin has a very rich quality to it.
  • Driving dynamics is better than Telluride - steering is well-weighted. Engine though is slightly unrefined and the ride is choppier on larger wheels (though not on the stock 19"/20" ones that the vehicle comes with) when compared to Telluride.
  • Its a Volvo - its top safety pick from IIHS and scored 5-star crash safety rating, while Telluride scored 4 stars.
  • 3 years of maintenance is free on Volvo's - so zero out-of-pocket costs for the first 3 years.
  • Volvo's Harmon Kardon sound system is better than the one that comes in Kia. Kia's one is decent but lot of people have reported muddling - not so with Volvo! it's a 14-speaker system with an amplifier. The standard system is better as well.
  • You have already listed that Volvo has auto-adjusting headlights, HD radio, and wifi hotspot!
  • Volvo's reliability is average at best, while Telluride has great projected reliability according to Consumer Reports. also, Volvo's 3rd row is tight with shoulder room and doesn't recline.
  • Volvo's warranty is worse when compared to Kia (I think its 4 yrs/ 50k miles).
  • With Volvo, you get Nappa leather and ventilated seats only in the top Inscription trim - which is about $5k more expensive - its Standard on SX Telluride.
As for brand - Volvo is an established and solid brand that pops up in every SUV conversation, while Kia is a new kid on the block who is doing really well, but has a very bruised past.
Anyone buying Telluride over MSRP should remember, that 5 years from now, there are going to be a ton of used 5-year old Tellurides for sale, while the new ones would be discounted as no car can keep up the demand for 5 straight years - and so, your Telluride will have a heavier total depreciation. Think about these and then make a decision on paying a cent over MSRP!
XC90 has a souped up 2.0L 4cyl... let's see how they digest 100K miles with occasional towing....
No thanks.
 
Who owns the brand is irrelevant these days. Your $100k Range Rover is made by an Indian company, your $500k Lambo is made by VW... for example.
 
Who owns the brand is irrelevant these days. Your $100k Range Rover is made by an Indian company, your $500k Lambo is made by VW... for example.
It’s relevant when a badge like Volvo use to have a calling card of being known as one of the safest family vehicles and prideful owners of driving very high miles reliably and that reputation slips after new ownership. Lambos might be owned by VW Group now but they are still handmade in Italy, the core of the brand has not changed.
______________________________
 
Last edited:
It’s relevant when a badge like Volvo use to have a calling card of being known as one of the safest family vehicles and prideful owners of driving very high miles reliably and that reputation slips after new ownership. Lambos might be owned by VW Group now but they are still handmade in Italy, the core of the brand has not changed.
Volvo too.
Volvo might be owned by Chinese now but they are still made in only Sweden, the core of the brand has not changed, As well as a lambo.
 
Volvo too.
Volvo might be owned by Chinese now but they are still made in only Sweden, the core of the brand has not changed, As well as a lambo.
 
Volvo too.
Volvo might be owned by Chinese now but they are still made in only Sweden, the core of the brand has not changed, As well as a lambo.
The brand Volvo was known for reliability and safety. They use to have a 150k club with TV commercials with pride filled owners bragging about their high mileage Volvo. A used Volvo was one of the most reliable cars you could buy so they held their value. It was normal to see an old Volvo on the road still being used as a daily driver. I think the Guinness World Record for a car with the most miles is still held by a Volvo with 3 million on the odometer. Now Volvo is expensive to maintain, shows up no where near the top in reliability comparisons and has one of the highest depreciation percentages of any brand. But I guess the core of the brand hasn’t changed because to the logo is still on the grille so people should just blindly assume it’s still a Volvo.
 
Last edited:
My point precisely. What better way to sell Geely sourced EVs to the American public than to assemble them in Texas and South Carolina and pass them off as Swedish influenced and American made. If I want a Chinese EV I can order a Kandi K27 which is taking orders in the US and it’s not trying to impersonate anything else. BTW Kandi sells EV batteries to Geely and in exchange Geely designs their cars. So I could buy a K27 for $15,500 with no haggle pricing (so no markups) before incentives or I can buy a Volvo with Kandi batteries for four times more. We can pretend that the headlines say Volvo bought Polestar and we are going to get EVs from Volvo to rival Tesla with hope of all that great Swedish tech we are use to. I have a hard time understanding how a brand that was acquired because they were struggling less than a decade ago can completely change their strategy overnight after acquiring a startup EV (that Geely really bought) to say that they are going to be all EV or hybrid in less than 5 years. Maybe Geely bought struggling Volvo out of the kindness of their hearts to keep the company alive and remain independent in Sweden to help the global economy. That’s not usually how acquisitions disguised as mergers play out.

Kia decided to invest in the US market to sell to the US market by putting their design HQ that came up with the Telluride in California and they are building them in Georgia but they aren’t using a different brand to do it. I prefer that approach.
______________________________
 
Last edited:
I like how this went from dealer up charge to discussing Geely's global strategies.

Also, remember when Mercedes diesels used to last forever? Now Mercedes just depreciate and when the warranty runs out it becomes a money pit.

Remember when Toyota was the cheapest car you can buy? Now a Land Cruiser costs $100k.

Remember when VW made quality, reliable, cheap cars? ...

Remember when Mazda made tricycles?

Remember when Toyota made sewing machines (they still do)

Now get off my lawn!
 
Last edited:
I like how this went from dealer up charge to discussing Geely's global strategies.

Also, remember when Mercedes diesels used to last forever? Now Mercedes just depreciate and when the warranty runs out it becomes a money pit.

Remember when Toyota was the cheapest car you can buy? Now a Land Rover costs $100k.

Remember when VW made quality, reliable, cheap cars? ...

Remember when Mazda made tricycles?

Remember when Toyota made sewing machines (they still do)

Now get off my lawn!
Well . . . we started with dealer's having what some people thought was excessive markup, but as we examined further it's really about value that the Telluride offers to what is out there. People with means willing to overpay because the alternatives to what they feel is value in a 3-row midsized SUV are slim and they are impatient. We heard Kia being irresponsible for not forcing dealers to price higher, we heard suckers for impatient buyers with means willing to spend more, we heard dealers being greedy for trying to make maximum profit in a free market and we heard competitors that use to be a solid choice no longer what they use to be. I think we are all trying to explain why the markups. I think it comes down to cars aren't like they use to be, the economy isn't the same as it was and buyers aren't operating like they use to. That's the crux of it, some buyers are patient and do their research and want to stick to MSRP, some buyers aren't patient and see the windows sticker with the markups ignoring MSRP and find value in other areas. We are all different and motivated by different things.

I tend to think that some shoppers tend to consider a lease and only want to keep their car for a couple years and they have an amount of acceptable loss because they will be buying an EV in a couple years. I agree with the comment above that electric vehicle adoption is the big unknown. But all the major manufacturers seem to think it's where they are headed.

With regard to Geely's global strategies, it should come as no surprise that the happy marriage with Sweden is starting to dissolve. They want a piece of the global market that Kia and Hyundai are jumping into feet first and to be the first major breakout Chinese car company to become a global player will be a big deal. You can't be global without breaking into the US. For now none of those Chinese car companies have had to go far beyond China since China has more car sales than any other country. BUT, when you consider the EV market . . . an EV is just an electric appliance with wheels that you sit in. As Tesla has proven the car can be a vessel for the technology. For example everyone knows the TV household names that export from Japan (Sony, Panasonic, Sharp) and South Korea (Samsung, LG). But all the other budget brands, Vizio, Hisense, TCL, Onn, etc. are all manufactured in China with a different circuit board and operating system and varying levels of quality. (FYI, Element TVs are the only TVs assembled in the US). What evidence do we have that global auto manufacturing won't follow the same path as the television as a household electronic appliance? After all, you will have to plug it in at home. :)

Ford has determined their exit strategy is to just focus on SUVs, Trucks and EVs because that's where their profit is going to come. GM just announced that Cadillac will go all electric and any dealers that don't like it can leave. So this is why there is a markup on Telluride SUVs, there is an opportunity for a market in high demand in the US amongst a number of different buyers and uncertainty in other brands and quality and reliability issues in others, while Kia looks like a sure bet. Maybe there is a market for cheap cars and SUVs that we use and throw away and replace every couple of years like iPhones. But in the US market we have a pretty big secondary used car market that also offers an opportunity to sell better quality cars. We like to haul and tow more than most and we also have more highways than some countries so we travel, so we like SUVs and Trucks more than some other markets. Many Americans buy or lease with depreciation in mind so if you have a car that will be better built and can be resold in a few years and you can enjoy the ride more for a few years, you are willing to take a little more of a loss for that opportunity.

I see your "Now get off my lawn!" and raise you:

“You have to know the past to understand the present.”


― Carl Sagan
 
Last edited:
Well . . . we started with dealer's having what some people thought was excessive markup, but as we examined further it's really about value that the Telluride offers to what is out there. People with means willing to overpay because the alternatives to what they feel is value in a 3-row midsized SUV are slim and they are impatient. We heard Kia being irresponsible for not forcing dealers to price higher, we heard suckers for impatient buyers with means willing to spend more, we heard dealers being greedy for trying to make maximum profit in a free market and we heard competitors that use to be a solid choice no longer what they use to be. I think we are all trying to explain why the markups. I think it comes down to cars aren't like they use to be, the economy isn't the same as it was and buyers aren't operating like they use to. That's the crux of it, some buyers are patient and do their research and want to stick to MSRP, some buyers aren't patient and see the windows sticker with the markups ignoring MSRP and find value in other areas. We are all different and motivated by different things.

I tend to think that some shoppers tend to consider a lease and only want to keep their car for a couple years and they have an amount of acceptable loss because they will be buying an EV in a couple years. I agree with the comment above that electric vehicle adoption is the big unknown. But all the major manufacturers seem to think it's where they are headed.

With regard to Geely's global strategies, it should come as no surprise that the happy marriage with Sweden is starting to dissolve. They want a piece of the global market that Kia and Hyundai are jumping into feet first and to be the first major breakout Chinese car company to become a global player will be a big deal. You can't be global without breaking into the US. For now none of those Chinese car companies have had to go far beyond China since China has more car sales than any other country. BUT, when you consider the EV market . . . an EV is just an electric appliance with wheels that you sit in. As Tesla has proven the car can be a vessel for the technology. For example everyone knows the TV household names that export from Japan (Sony, Panasonic, Sharp) and South Korea (Samsung, LG). But all the other budget brands, Vizio, Hisense, TCL, Onn, etc. are all manufactured in China with a different circuit board and operating system and varying levels of quality. (FYI, Element TVs are the only TVs assembled in the US). What evidence do we have that global auto manufacturing won't follow the same path as the television as a household electronic appliance? After all, you will have to plug it in at home. :)

Ford has determined their exit strategy is to just focus on SUVs, Trucks and EVs because that's where their profit is going to come. GM just announced that Cadillac will go all electric and any dealers that don't like it can leave. So this is why there is a markup on Telluride SUVs, there is an opportunity for a market in high demand in the US amongst a number of different buyers and uncertainty in other brands and quality and reliability issues in others, while Kia looks like a sure bet. Maybe there is a market for cheap cars and SUVs that we use and throw away and replace every couple of years like iPhones. But in the US market we have a pretty big secondary used car market that also offers an opportunity to sell better quality cars. We like to haul and tow more than most and we also have more highways than some countries so we travel, so we like SUVs and Trucks more than some other markets. Many Americans buy or lease with depreciation in mind so if you have a car that will be better built and can be resold in a few years and you can enjoy the ride more for a few years, you are willing to take a little more of a loss for that opportunity.

I see your "Now get off my lawn!" and raise you:

“You have to know the past to understand the present.”


― Carl Sagan

I'm not sure I get your point. Is it that no one really knows what is going to happen with the next round of globalization and changing consumer relationships with vehicles so everything is just a guess at this point so pay whatever you think it is worth?

That being said, I would consider the XC90 Inscription Expression IF I could get a leftover for around $60k.
 
I'm not sure I get your point. Is it that no one really knows what is going to happen with the next round of globalization and changing consumer relationships with vehicles so everything is just a guess at this point so pay whatever you think it is worth?
My point is that we seem to want to blame someone for markups but there is no blame to be had. Everyone is different and motivated differently. If you don’t want to pay a markup, keep looking and know that patience is required. But MSRP isn’t the only thing people measure. A free market is people paying what they think something is worth and it may go down with time but if you wait too long there is also a chance that it may go up.
 




Back
Top