• Hint: Use a descriptive title for your new message
    If you're looking for help and want to draw people in who can assist you, use a descriptive subject title when posting your message. In other words, "I need help with my SUV" could be about anything and can easily be overlooked by people who can help. However, "I need help with my transmission" will draw interest from people who can help with a transmission specific issue. Be as descriptive as you can. Please also post in the appropriate forum. The "Lounge" is for introducing yourself. If you need help with your leather interior, please post in the Interior section - and so on... This message can be closed by clicking the X in the top right corner.
  • Car enthusiast? Join us on Cars Connected! iOS | Android | Desktop

The Telluride (and Palisade) Will Continue to Kill It for a While

zhelder

FOUNDING MEMBER
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
327
Reaction score
466
Points
63
New Highlander... a dud. New MDX... a dud (at a lousy price). Redesigned Pilot... pushed back to 2023 MY, and also likely a dud. BMW X5? OK, that’s a nice car... but not may people have 70K to buy one decently equipped.

My point is, no other SUV on the market now offers the bang for the buck that the Telluride (and, honestly, the Palisade too) offer for the money, and that’s unlikely to change anytime soon. :)
 
New Highlander... a dud. New MDX... a dud (at a lousy price). Redesigned Pilot... pushed back to 2023 MY, and also likely a dud. BMW X5? OK, that’s a nice car... but not may people have 70K to buy one decently equipped.

My point is, no other SUV on the market now offers the bang for the buck that the Telluride (and, honestly, the Palisade too) offer for the money, and that’s unlikely to change anytime soon. :)
Yep, you're right. Glad you got yours!
 
Yep, you're right. Glad you got yours!
Thanks! And ooh... how did I forget the GV80? Too small, I’m personally not crazy about the exterior styling, and looking at 65K to get it well-equipped (I think the standard analog dash in the GV80 is uglier than both the Telluride and Palisade analog dashboards.)
 
Thanks! And ooh... how did I forget the GV80? Too small, I’m personally not crazy about the exterior styling, and looking at 65K to get it well-equipped (I think the standard analog dash in the GV80 is uglier than both the Telluride and Palisade analog dashboards.)

I agree. I can't justify the price of the GV80 either. Very different vehicle designed to compete with the X5. Not the market I want to shop in right now. I suspect they will be successful with it - as a niche product and sales will be a fraction of the Telluride.
______________________________
 
The new pathfinder is a strong contender for 3rd place, but nothing competes with the Telly!
 
Stinky headrest
______________________________
 
Passed by local Hyundai dealer today...at least 10 white Pallisades and a couple of colors out front since end of last week. Local Kia dealer (same owner and about 1/4 mile up same road) I have never seen more than 2 Tellys on the lot at a time. Personally did not like the Pallisade at all from the cockpit to the styling.
 
Like most people on this forum, I'm very pleased with my Telluride purchase. However, I can't get on board with this thread. The numbers on the lot don't matter. The demand is so high for this type of vehicle and Kia has a hit with the Telluride, but they can't make enough. That doesn't mean they are killing it in sales. I see it as the exact opposite, they have a big problem, they hit a wall. That means that they are losing out on an opportunity because their supply can't meet the demand.

The number of cars manufactured and even the fewer number of cars delivered to dealers doesn't mean one is doing better than another. It just means you have buyers (demand) willing to put down a deposit and wait for months for the supply. As long as supply doesn't equal demand you will always see selling at or above MSRP and low inventory. You are just witnessing lost opportunity. I'm sure every Kia dealership (except the ones with the ridiculous markups) would rather have more Tellurides on the lot to make more on volume than margin. I'm sure it's not fun taking deposits for only a small segment of patient buyers that you can't cash in on until the vehicle arrives and the salesperson is just hoping the buyer doesn't bail. All the awards and accolades are all meant to help sales since the only true measure of comparison for sales is the number of cars sold. If you can't supply the demand, then you are meeting your quota but you aren't maximizing the sales potential. The dealer and Kia don't get credit until the sale is made and the owner takes delivery.

US Sales figures only (not counting other markets):

  • Tellurides sold all of 2020 - 75,129
  • Tellurides sold in February 2021 - 6,637

  • Palisade sold in the US all of 2020 - 81,905
  • Palisade sold in the US in Feb 2021 - 6,354
Nationwide that's 4% difference in February 2021. Maybe with better dealer allocation that 4% would be smaller if logistically they could predict regional demand better and move around inventory to have fewer on the lot. I'm sure the people in West Point are working really hard, but they are limited to the parts supply they have and their production numbers capped for the Sorento and K5 product lines the factory also has to make. And now that Hyundai resolved the headrest issue and acknowledged transmission problems, people will forget about those details if they can sit in the car.

What those numbers compared to the inventory on the lot do tell me are that Kia is capped at that number because they are selling as quickly as they are getting made. By comparison, since Hyundai has a larger manufacturing pipeline and they have inventory on the lot today, the Palisade sales could go higher. I wonder if the priority for Hyundai is to stock inventory in the lots that are just down the road from a Kia dealership lot that doesn't have Tellurides to sell to catch those buyers looking for a car now and not willing to wait.

Now look at one of the market leaders and think about it when you drive past a Toyota lot with dozens of Highlanders waiting for their buyers to hop in and drive away.
  • Highlanders sold in the US all of 2020 - 212,276
  • Highlanders sold in the US in Feb 2021 - 19,064

The Telluride is selling well, but it could be doing way better. The small number on lots means there is not enough supply to meet the market demand, not necessarily that one is selling better than another. Since Hyundai has a larger manufacturing capacity the Palisade has a better chance at meeting demand over the Telluride if they want to catch the likes of: Highlander, Explorer, Grand Cherokee, Traverse, and Pilot. All of those vehicles have inventory on lots and are selling more per month than the Telluride. I'm not suggesting that those vehicles are better than the Telluride, but you can't sell what you don't have to sell (a deposit is just a promise of a future sale, not a sale). By comparison to Kia those models are killing it more in a very hot large mid-sized SUV market. It's probably why Jeep is adding a third row with the GC-L.

2020 US Midsize SUV Sales Figures
2021 US Midsize SUV Sales Figures

Kia has a couple more years to sell more Tellurides and build brand loyalty drawing people to the Sorento, K5, Stinger, Soul and other cars until everything with an internal combustion engine gets upended for EVs.

My take on the other vehicles discussed here:
  • Highlander sales still very high
  • MDX while bigger than previous years is not the same class as it is a tiny 3rd row, performance SUV, different buyer
  • Pilot sales are good enough to hold out a little longer for EVs so why redesign now
  • X5 like the MDX is a different class that might appeal to a GV80 shopper
  • 2022 Pathfinder has a chance to steal some sales from the Telluride and Palisade, the specs are close since Nissan ditched the CVT transmission and it comes with a more impressive towing package rated for 6,000 lbs still on a unibody. If you don't mind the bloated exterior appearance, the interior and specs look actually pretty close to the Telluride.
 
Last edited:
While Highlander sales are still very high, Toyota has had to throw more $$ on the hood (despite being newer than the Telluride) to keep moving them at such level.

The MDX's 3rd row is really not any more cramped than what's in the Highlander, and Acura dealerships still have tons of the old model on the lots despite heavy incentives.

Aside from the small minority that wants the more athletic handling for a 3-row CUV (or need a lux badge), the Telluride SXP bests the MDX in numerous ways, and the difference in grade of interiors isn't that wide.

The Telluride (and Pallisade) has mpacted what the competition has had to with regards to incentives to make the same sale.
 
Last edited:
No doubt. But there is also no question that this is a really hot market for every car maker looking for a piece of the pie. Larger midsized with 7 or 8 passenger but still having fuel economy. It checks so many boxes for so many buyers who don’t want to jump to a larger truck sized SUV. Being aesthetically appealing and adding luxury features helps.
______________________________
 
Good point. The Ascent is competing only for the AWD market. It also only has a 4cyl turbo, less horsepower, and a CVT transmission. Appeals to some buyers (especially the ones that are willing to pay for the Subaru badge) but side by side it’s not the same value as the higher sellers. I see it as slightly less capable and Subaru’s are historically expensive to maintain. Sure you can keep your Subaru on the road for generations like the commercials lead you to believe, but not many people are willing to drop tons of money to fix an old car especially when the cost to maintain is double or more that of other cars. It’s a good thing that people drive up the cost for Subaru resale because they perceive higher quality, the seller is trying to get back some of what they lost on maintenance. Personally, I think that Subaru’s bread and butter is the compact SUV and perceived added value in forcing you to buy their AWD. I think the Forester is more than double the production of the Ascent. The Ascent struggles with a similar challenge as the Telluride, made in the US and primarily sold in the US market only. So exporting from other larger factories to make up for additional demand isn’t an option.
 
Last edited:
Good point. The Ascent is competing only for the AWD market. It also only has a 4cyl turbo, less horsepower, and a CVT transmission. Appeals to some buyers (especially the ones that are willing to pay for the Subaru badge) but side by side it’s not the same value as the higher sellers. I see it as slightly less capable and Subaru’s are historically expensive to maintain. Sure you can keep your Subaru on the road for generations like the commercials lead you to believe, but not many people are willing to drop tons of money to fix an old car especially when the cost to maintain is double or more that of other cars. It’s a good thing that people drive up the cost for Subaru resale because they perceive higher quality, the seller is trying to get back some of what they lost on maintenance. Personally, I think that Subaru’s bread and butter is the compact SUV and perceived added value in forcing you to buy their AWD. I think the Forester is more than double the production of the Ascent. The Ascent struggles with a similar challenge as the Telluride, made in the US and primarily sold in the US market only. So exporting from other larger factories to make up for additional demand isn’t an option.

It won’t happen until sales dip (which they won’t) but I am hoping the Telluride gets a hybrid since the mpg is the only area I see lacking.....a nightfall, hybrid, with a “wilderness” package (a touch more ground clearance).....wow.....

But I’m dreaming...
 
It won’t happen until sales dip (which they won’t) but I am hoping the Telluride gets a hybrid since the mpg is the only area I see lacking.....a nightfall, hybrid, with a “wilderness” package (a touch more ground clearance).....wow.....

But I’m dreaming...
It could happen with a hybrid but maybe not until the Telluride is up for a redesign. The Telluride's V6 today can get about 330 miles on a full take of gas. Kia is announcing the EV6 electric crossover that is reportedly going to be able to do 300 miles on a 20 minute charge. I think the existing motor and drivetrain are likely what the Telluride will get until a larger midsized EV is announced. I think I read that over the next 9 years Kia wants to be selling almost a million EV, Hybrid and plug-in Hybrid. Since most models get a redesign after 4 years, I could see the next generation Telluride having a bigger hybrid model evolved from the Niro today.

With all the press that Ford got with their Hybrid F150s during the Texas power outage saving some people by using it as a home generator, I’m sure that a number of people will start reconsidering Hybrids in SUVs and Trucks for camping and backup power duty.
______________________________
 
Last edited:
It won’t happen until sales dip (which they won’t) but I am hoping the Telluride gets a hybrid since the mpg is the only area I see lacking.....a nightfall, hybrid, with a “wilderness” package (a touch more ground clearance).....wow.....

But I’m dreaming...

A hybrid is a possibility once the Telluride switches over to the new N3 platform, which could happen as soon as the FL.

But HMG will have to develop a new hybrid powertrain with the 2.5T (the 1.6T hybrid system won't do on something as big/heavy as the Telluride).
 
I have an order in for a Telluride SX, but boy that new Explorer ST is always in the back of my mind. I think it looks awesome.
 
Agreed; like the styling on the new Explorer. There’s one down the street from me. The front end is sharp
 




Back
Top